The resource you're requesting could not be located (404).

Note: As of early january 2019, BETTERFINANCE has a new website, and it seems the content you are trying to access has been moved or its address has been updated.
Here below is a list of what we think might be related to the content you're interested in.
29 search results

On the 13th of July the Dutch Court of Appeal endorsed the agreement between Ageas, the legal heir of Fortis, and the organisations representing the abused shareholders. A deal has been reached ten years after the dismantling of Fortis, with a sum of € 1.3 billion on the table to compensate the shareholders who will

Despite 9 years of procedure and negotiations, the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam has declared non-binding the €12 billion settlement agreed by Fortis (now Ageas) and the consumer associations (Deminor, StichtingFortisEffect, VEB, Sicaf…) non-binding. In March 2016, Ageas agreed with the consumers associations to find a settlement that had to be endorsed by the Court

Ageas, the Dutch shareholder association VEB and other plaintiff associations have reached an agreement on civil proceedings involving the former Fortis, for the 2007 and 2008 events. Ageas will pay 1.204 billion euros to “shareholders covered by the eligible transaction" "without acknowledging any fault," said Ageas in a statement. "We hope that those who are

Representing 5,500 Fortis shareholders, Deminor – a leading European company focusing on shareholder engagement and investor protection – has been given the green light to carry on its lawsuit against Ageas, BNP Paribas Fortis and Merrill Lynch. A judgment by the Belgian Commercial Court recognized the admissibility of the Deminor litigation. Deminor accuses the three

Individual investors never agreed with the dismantling of Fortis and are now asking for compensation. The francophone court of Brussels will handle the case with more than 5 billion euro at stake. The issues under investigation are the dismantling of Fortis and the sale of a part of the former bank. More than 1000 shareholders

Following a recent decision by a Dutch court, aggrieved Fortis shareholders are entitled to damages under Dutch law. Stichting Fortis Effect, which represents some Fortis shareholders who suffered damages following the nationalisation of the former Dutch bank in September 2008, won its appeal against Ageas (formerly Fortis), but lost against the Dutch State. Ageas and Fortis

Collective Redress Directive – a directive for initiating court actions against companies who infringe consumers rights

BETTER FINANCE has long advocated for an EU-wide collective redress mechanism for all financial services users, including small and individual shareholders or employee shareholders, and provided support to consumer organisations in collective redress schemes in the field of financial services (such as Fortis, Volkswagen AG). BETTER FINANCE welcomes the European Commission’s (EC) proposal for a

Inspired to some extent from BETTER FINANCE’s 2017 Briefing Paper on mis-selling of financial products as well as its study into the issue of Closet Indexing at the beginning of the year, the European Parliament’s ECON committee has now commissioned studie into the mis-selling of financial products to European individual investors, looking at how and

Fully in line with BETTER FINANCE’s 2017 Briefing Paper on mis-selling of financial products as well as its study into the issue of Closet Indexing at the beginning of the year, the European Parliament’s ECON committee is now commissioning a study into the mis-selling of financial products to European individual investors, looking at how and

WordPress › Error

There has been a critical error on this website.

Learn more about troubleshooting WordPress.